Wednesday, February 01, 2006

The Trial

Ok what the hell does anyone hope to accomplish with this trivial crap? The trial of SH is such a hippocritical joke, and no one except fanatic zealots take it seriously. What right does the US (who is controlling the trial no matter what the stupid iraqi judges say) have to say what SH did at any point in his presidency is a crime or not?

One of the main focuses: Iraqi authorities put Saddam and seven other former Iraqi officials on trial on October 19, 2005 four days after the October 15, 2005 referendum on the new constitution. The tribunal specifically charged the defendants with the killing of 143 Shiites from Dujail, in retaliation for the failed assassination attempt of 8 July 1982.

So think about this for a second. He retaliated for a failed assasination attempt... And why are we at war with the middle east? In retaliation for 9/11/01 maybe? And yet we've killed much much more than just 143 people. So how is this any different? He is right to challenge the legitimacy of the court, since they have no legitimacy. They are set up and overseen by the US military, and I GUARANTEE you that if for some reason the judge lets him off with anything less than death, the military won't allow it.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your are Nice. And so is your site! Maybe you need some more pictures. Will return in the near future.
»

8:33 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home